Leroy Politsch Legacy MP3 Interview by Francis Borgia Steck in mid-1950s of Mr. Edward Cook, whose father, Samual, found the Ellington Stone |
|
Photo by Carl J. Weber |
|
Quincy Museum
|
Quincy on the Mississippi |
![]() |
![]() |
The Ellington Stone Photo by Leroy Politsch |
Photo taken in 1927 of Robert Griep (1914-1995) "Proof that the stone is not a recent find..." Leroy Politsch |
TopLeroy Politsch legacy
The late Leroy Politsch (1922-2008) kept alive the lore and legend of the Ellington Stone for fifty-two years. He had over the decades corresponded with hundreds of experts in universities, museums, historical societies, etc., trying to solve the "mystery" of the Ellington Stone. But he could, from the experts, garner only that "it might have something to do with the explorer La Salle." This association of the Ellington Stone (with its Jesuit insignia) and the activities of LaSalle should have been rejected by knowledgeable authorities from the outset. Leroy and I had a friendly disagreement about this. Given the enmity that existed between LaSalle and the Jesuit Missionaries, suggesting La Salle was directly involved with the Ellington Stone is tantamount to the Soviet Union having been behind planting the American flag on the moon.
|
TopA New Oldest European artifact in the North American heartlandWe would be safe to acknowledge the Ellington Stone, inscribed with the date 1671, as
In the 1960s, after examination by epigraphers (those studying inscriptions) at the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, they gave the not-too-informative: there was nothing inconsistent with the stone being authentic. Recent analysis of the Ellington Stone at the University of Illinois, under the oversight of Dr. Sarah Wisseman, established the artifact as created from regional limestone. Housed in the Quincy Museum, Quincy Illinois, the Ellington Stone predates the 1686 "Perrot's Ostensorium," housed in the Neville Public Museum, Green Bay Wisconsin. The Neville Museum describes the ostensorium as "the earliest known artifact of European occupation".
In addition to the Ellington Stone's legitimacy as the earliest European artifact, its date contests yet another "fact" of the historical record. For more than three centuries, hasn't it been a universal schoolbook fact that the first Europeans to "discover" the Mississippi in the 17th Century, Père Jacques Marquette and Louis Jolliet, were, in 1673, the first to set foot on its banks? |
TopInternet-available documents identify a geographic and historical context for the Ellington Stone.
|
Jesuit Map of Lake Superior, 1671Jesuit Map of Lake Superior relating to the Ellington StoneA remarkable detail on the following map of Lake Superior contributes to further embedding the artifact in a historical context. On the 1672 -published map in Jesuit Relations, observe at the far southwest of the lake the dotted-line legend translating, "Route to the Illinois [Indians], 150 leagues toward the south." Historians, when they have occasionally mentioned it, have consistently maintained that the Jesuits had only second-hand knowledge of the "route to the Illinois," having gained what they knew from the Illinois Indians who sojourned from their homeland in the south to Lake Superior to visit the missionaries.
Top
Could the Indians really have given data? "Route to the Illinois, 150 leagues toward the south"? W.P. Cumming speaks to it,
|
TopThe Jesuit Missionaries violated the royal injunction forbidding the expansion of their activitiesAlthough not stated explicitly, there are at least a few hints in the published Jesuit narratives that missionaries had, in fact, under the immediate authority of Jesuit Claude Allouez, braved their way south into the lands of the Illinois, countermanding the king's wishes. The Ellington Stone, unless some hoax, bizarre and extravagant, is confirmation of the period's well known Jesuit missionary zeal. Why wasn't it stated explicitly in the 1670s that the Jesuit missionaries had been to the Illinois territories — a visit seemingly verified by the Ellington Stone and corroborated by the maps? The explanation appears to lie in the fact that the royal authorities, and the King himself, repeatedly over several years, had forbidden the Jesuits from pushing their zealotry into uncharted regions. The simple explanation is that before 1663 the Jesuits had unbridled authority in New France. When King Louis XIV assumed the throne he determined to transform the "missionary" colony into a royal colony. Curtailing the Jesuit political authority was a very delicate process The following quotes are from Documents Relative to the Colonial History of New York; Procured in Holland, England an France, 1855, edited by E. B. O'Callaghan, Volume lX.
The publication by the Jesuits of the Lake Superior Map was an affront to the throne and to the security of France. The King suspended the rights of the Jesuits to publish their yearly reports of what it was like in the New World.. The King had forbidden the Jesuits to expand their activities. The publication of the map (which accompanied a narrative description of the waterways and terrain ) was in open defiance of Louis XIVths dictates. Modern writers on the subject of the king's suspension of the Jesuit yearly reports have offered several explanations, but none had seen the thread as seen in the quotations above, the royal authority repeatedly warning the missionaries, and then cutting off their "privilege" to publish their reports in Paris. |
TopThe Quincy-Beardstown Corridor at the 40th degree of latitudeQuincy has several noteworthy distinguishing geographic characteristics. Quincy Bay, an arm of the Mississippi, has one of the most welcoming and agreeable harbors on the entire river, making the bay a not unlikely stopping-off point. And even more consequential, Quincy is the eastern end of an easily traversed overland corridor. The city of Beardstown, on the Illinois River, is the western end of the corridor.
On the Illinois River, Beardstown is found on an overland journey eastward from Quincy at approximately the 40th degree of latitude . This is where de La Salle's supporters in France edited material about his having found a very large Illinois Indian settlement at latitude 40. In this region, on the Illinois river, is where the documents suggest, although I'm uncertain, he established his short-lived Fort Crèvecoeur. In studying more than a hundred very early maps, I found that this fort was consistently placed cartographically at the 40th degree of latitude (notwithstanding technologically precise latitudes from this period are hardly to be expected). Nonetheless, putting maps and the primary source documents together led me to conjecture that de La Salle's Fort Crèvecoeur could be searched for with some likelihood of success in the Beardstown Illinois area, not in the environs of Peoria Illinois, as has always been the case. I've been through the files at the Peoria Library. Over the past century there has been a succession of "finally-found-it" breakthroughs coming to naught. On a side note, some years ago I sent detail images from about forty pre-1830 maps to a knowledgeable regional historian, Harold Tyson, of Beardstown. I had also sent a set of the forty maps to Politsch in Quincy. I shared my ideas of Fort Crèvecoeur with Tyson, and discussed with him also the Ellington Stone, Politsch's work, and the wider historical context. Tyson reported at length anecdotally on the Indian legacy of the Beardstown area and told me of his confidence in the ancient Quincy-Beardstown route that I am focusing on. My original theory to look for La Salle's fort in the Beardstown area has sparked interest in the archeological community to search for hints of its long-vanished structures there. On a personal excursion over the major highway between Quincy and Beardstown, approximately the same overland route seen above on the map published in 1681, I was understandably excited to come upon a historical land site marker announcing the highway as the 49ers' favored overland route of the famed 1849 California Gold rush. |
Top
In Summary
In attempting to outline a historical context to demystify the Ellington Stone, I've proposed a number of ideas.
the insignia on the Ellington Stone identifies it as a creation of the Jesuit missionaries, given the antipathy between the Jesuits and de La Salle, the Jesuit insignia disqualifies the possibility of LaSalle's involvement, the most likely explanation of what it is: it's the main fragment of a gravestone, the Jesuit insignia at the top of the marker is found on Jesuit gravestones, published photographs of the Ellington Stone have done injustice to its probable proper vertical positioning — the cross in the top of the H should point straight up, marking on the Jesuit map of Lake Superior gives, in written notation, a very good approximation of Quincy and the homelands of the Illinois Indians, 150 French leagues to the south, the Ellington Stone, at face value, forces the inference of Jesuit first-hand knowledge of the Illinois Indians homeland noted on the1672 published map of Lake Superior, the Thèvenot map, published in 1681, and the narrative that it accompanied, substantiate a number of observations: the Jesuits were familiar at this time with Quincy Bay, the corridor at the 40th degree of latitude ("route of return"), and the Beardstown location at the Illinois River, given the royal injunctions forbidding Jesuit missionary activity in uncharted lands, the secrecy at the time is understandable, the Ellington Stone date, 1671, marks as quite probable the exploration of the Illinois region and the Mississippi River two years earlier than the "first Europeans" in the persons of Jolliet and Marquette, the artifact can make a solid claim as the earliest European artifact in the North American Heartland.Top