The Ellington Stone Demystified

Carl J. Weber

Home

Leroy Politsch Legacy
A New Oldest European artifact
Documents
Jesuit Map of Lake Superior
Did the Indians really give map data
Missionaries violate King's orders
The Quincy-Beardstown Corridor
Summary

MP3 Interview by Francis Borgia Steck in mid-1950s of Mr. Edward Cook, whose father, Samual, found the Ellington Stone

 

 

Photo by Carl J. Weber

Quincy Museum
Home of the "mysterious" small gray slab
known as the Ellington Stone


Quincy on the Mississippi
(in Ellington Township, Adams County, Illinois)

 

elSt
RbtGrg
The Ellington Stone
Photo by Leroy Politsch
Photo taken in 1927 of Robert Griep (1914-1995)
"Proof that the stone is not a recent find..." Leroy Politsch

 

Top

Home

Leroy Politsch legacy

 

"It was through the friendship of a rural mail carrier, Charles Griep, that I came to know about the stone, sometime in the late 1930's, and, finally in 1956 did I have the time and facilities to begin an investigation and study of it...The Ellington Stone (1988), Leroy Politsch, Politsch Collection, Quincy, Illinois.

The late Leroy Politsch (1922-2008) kept alive the lore and legend of the Ellington Stone for fifty-two years. He had over the decades corresponded with hundreds of experts in universities, museums, historical societies, etc., trying to solve the "mystery" of the Ellington Stone. But he could, from the experts, garner only that "it might have something to do with the explorer La Salle."

This association of the Ellington Stone (with its Jesuit insignia) and the activities of LaSalle should have been rejected by knowledgeable authorities from the outset. Leroy and I had a friendly disagreement about this. Given the enmity that existed between LaSalle and the Jesuit Missionaries, suggesting La Salle was directly involved with the Ellington Stone is tantamount to the Soviet Union having been behind planting the American flag on the moon.


Leroy J. Politsch

Politsch and Weber, June 2004, Quincy Il

 

Top

A New Oldest European artifact in the North American heartland

We would be safe to acknowledge the Ellington Stone, inscribed with the date 1671, as
  • the oldest known artifact witnessing 17th century European exploration and discovery in the Illinois territory.
  • More impressively, as historic relic, it attests to the earliest 17th century European appearance generally in the American heartland and at the Mississippi River, specifically.
In the 1960s, after examination by epigraphers (those studying inscriptions) at the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, they gave the not-too-informative: there was nothing inconsistent with the stone being authentic. Recent analysis of the Ellington Stone at the University of Illinois, under the oversight of Dr. Sarah Wisseman, established the artifact as created from regional limestone. Housed in the Quincy Museum, Quincy Illinois, the Ellington Stone predates the 1686 "Perrot's Ostensorium," housed in the Neville Public Museum, Green Bay Wisconsin. The Neville Museum describes the ostensorium as "the earliest known artifact of European occupation".

Used by Permission Quincy Museum

Photos of the Ellington Stone are invariably shown with the date 1671 resting on a near-horizontal axes, or with the right-hand edge aligned vertically.

Photo by L. Alexander

 

Photo by Leroy Politsch

Another Jesuit Gravestone, that of Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J.

http://jesuitjoe.blogspot.com/2007_04_01_archive.html

In addition to the Ellington Stone's legitimacy as the earliest European artifact, its date contests yet another "fact" of the historical record. For more than three centuries, hasn't it been a universal schoolbook fact that the first Europeans to "discover" the Mississippi in the 17th Century, Père Jacques Marquette and Louis Jolliet, were, in 1673, the first to set foot on its banks?

 

Top

Home

Internet-available documents identify a geographic and historical context for the Ellington Stone.


Image of Jesuit's IHS with cross above H is seen on the Ellington Stone. The image at left is taken from the title page of Jesuit Relations, published 1672 in Paris. The book contains a map and narrative relating to the North American French Jesuit missionary activities during 1670-71 — the time frame of the Ellington Stone.

This 'IHS' abbreviation for 'Jesus', the insignia on the Ellington Stone, identifies the artifact as a Jesuit creation. (Also part of the image at left are the three nails of the crucifixion.)

From title page, Jesuit Relations, Cramoisy Press, Paris, 1672 (the full title is Les Relation de ce qui s’est passé de plus remarquable aux Missions des Peres de la compagnie de Jesus en la Nouvelle France)

 

Top

Home

Jesuit Map of Lake Superior, 1671

Jesuit Map of Lake Superior relating to the Ellington Stone

A remarkable detail on the following map of Lake Superior contributes to further embedding the artifact in a historical context. On the 1672 -published map in Jesuit Relations, observe at the far southwest of the lake the dotted-line legend translating, "Route to the Illinois [Indians], 150 leagues toward the south." Historians, when they have occasionally mentioned it, have consistently maintained that the Jesuits had only second-hand knowledge of the "route to the Illinois," having gained what they knew from the Illinois Indians who sojourned from their homeland in the south to Lake Superior to visit the missionaries.

Jesuit Map of Lake Superior

The dotted line detail of Jesuit Map of Lake Superior at left. The legend reads "Route to the Illinois [Indians], 150 leagues toward the south."

 

This map accompanied accounts of missionary activities, 1670-71, as published for popular consumption the following year.
When mentioning it at all, historians, straining to connect the dotted line to facts of record, have remarked that the Jesuits, not having been to the Illinois homelands themselves, got the direction and distance attested on the map from the Illinois Indians, who are documented to have appeared at the 1665-established Mission of St. Esprit (seen on the map) soon after it was founded by Father Claude Allouez. The Ellington Stone argues for Jesuit first-hand knowledge of Quincy Bay..

Top

Home

 

Could the Indians really have given data?

"Route to the Illinois, 150 leagues toward the south"? W.P. Cumming speaks to it,

In the Relations too we appreciate the importance as well as the limitations of the Indian as pathfinder. The mysterious land beyond the river or over the ridge was often familiar territory to the Indian; but his range of travel and therefore of knowledge was usually (though not invariably) limited, and even when he had come far his lack of the Europeans' surveying skills made it difficult for him to convey accurate information on routes and distances. (W.P. Cummings, The Exploration of North America, p. 32.)

Newberry Library, Ayer Collection, 48

Another map detail at left from a few years later shows "Route to the Illinois, 150 leagues toward the south." This map is attributed to Louis Jolliet and no doubt the script uses the Jesuit map above as a model. Another at right, from more than a decade later says "old route" to the Illinois (from Sarah Jones Tucker collection).

The French league was roughly 2.5 miles. A degree of latitude is 69 miles. Calculating the latitude difference between the lower edge of Lake Superior and Quincy to be about 4 degrees -- returns approximately 150 leagues.

 

 

 

Top

The Jesuit Missionaries violated the royal injunction forbidding the expansion of their activities

Although not stated explicitly, there are at least a few hints in the published Jesuit narratives that missionaries had, in fact, under the immediate authority of Jesuit Claude Allouez, braved their way south into the lands of the Illinois, countermanding the king's wishes. The Ellington Stone, unless some hoax, bizarre and extravagant, is confirmation of the period's well known Jesuit missionary zeal.

Why wasn't it stated explicitly in the 1670s that the Jesuit missionaries had been to the Illinois territories — a visit seemingly verified by the Ellington Stone and corroborated by the maps? The explanation appears to lie in the fact that the royal authorities, and the King himself, repeatedly over several years, had forbidden the Jesuits from pushing their zealotry into uncharted regions. The simple explanation is that before 1663 the Jesuits had unbridled authority in New France. When King Louis XIV assumed the throne he determined to transform the "missionary" colony into a royal colony. Curtailing the Jesuit political authority was a very delicate process

The following quotes are from Documents Relative to the Colonial History of New York; Procured in Holland, England an France, 1855, edited by E. B. O'Callaghan, Volume lX.

May 1669 Colbert [Minister of the Colonies, France] to Courcelles [Governor of Canada], 15th May, 1669, "...prevent the too vast undertakings they [the Jesuits] may attempt."

King to Frontenac [Governor of Canada], 7th April, 1672, "...in case they [the Jesuits] desire to carry Ecclesiastical authority further than they ought to extend...skillfully oppose their designs...support these two Ecclesiastical bodies [Recollets and Sulpecians] in order to counterbalance the authority the Jesuit fathers might assume to the prejudice of that of his majesty."

O'Callaghan comments on a letter written in code by the governor of Canada to the French Court, Nov. 9th, 1672, "Frontenac communicated to the minister what he has done to keep in check the ever active ambition of the Jesuits." Frontenac mentions the unbridled power of the Jesuits over the other orders,

May 15th, 1674, Minister Colbert to Governor Frontenac, "As to the request the Jesuits made to continue their Missions in the far countries, his Majesty thinks 'twould be more advantageous both for the Religion and his service if they attended to those more near..." Ever vigilant not to openly confront the Jesuits, Colbert says, "[the King] merely desire that you would communicate to them, and gently encourage them to second, His Majesty's views."

The publication by the Jesuits of the Lake Superior Map was an affront to the throne and to the security of France. The King suspended the rights of the Jesuits to publish their yearly reports of what it was like in the New World.. The King had forbidden the Jesuits to expand their activities. The publication of the map (which accompanied a narrative description of the waterways and terrain ) was in open defiance of Louis XIVths dictates. Modern writers on the subject of the king's suspension of the Jesuit yearly reports have offered several explanations, but none had seen the thread as seen in the quotations above, the royal authority repeatedly warning the missionaries, and then cutting off their "privilege" to publish their reports in Paris.

 

Top

The Quincy-Beardstown Corridor at the 40th degree of latitude

Quincy has several noteworthy distinguishing geographic characteristics. Quincy Bay, an arm of the Mississippi, has one of the most welcoming and agreeable harbors on the entire river, making the bay a not unlikely stopping-off point. And even more consequential, Quincy is the eastern end of an easily traversed overland corridor. The city of Beardstown, on the Illinois River, is the western end of the corridor.

Quincy-Beardstown overland route.

Thèvenot Map, 1681, Library of Congress Web site
detail annotated by Carl J. Weber

The dotted line detail on map published in 1681 at the 40th degree of latitude between the Mississippi and Illinois rivers, is between the Quincy and Beardstown areas.

The above detail is from a map published by Melchisèdech Thèvenot, 1681, Paris. Historians, unable to classify the dotted line on the map, have said that this dotted-line, with the legend "route of return" (chemin de retour) was a mistake. From my perspective, the dotted line connects the 40th-degree-of-latitude Indian village on the Mississippi with the large Illinois Indian settlement (alluded to below) on the Illinois River at the same latitude. The maps of 1672 and 1681 and the period narratives tie together the Ellington Stone, Quincy, and the Jesuits.

On the Illinois River, Beardstown is found on an overland journey eastward from Quincy at approximately the 40th degree of latitude . This is where de La Salle's supporters in France edited material about his having found a very large Illinois Indian settlement at latitude 40. In this region, on the Illinois river, is where the documents suggest, although I'm uncertain, he established his short-lived Fort Crèvecoeur. In studying more than a hundred very early maps, I found that this fort was consistently placed cartographically at the 40th degree of latitude (notwithstanding technologically precise latitudes from this period are hardly to be expected). Nonetheless, putting maps and the primary source documents together led me to conjecture that de La Salle's Fort Crèvecoeur could be searched for with some likelihood of success in the Beardstown Illinois area, not in the environs of Peoria Illinois, as has always been the case. I've been through the files at the Peoria Library. Over the past century there has been a succession of "finally-found-it" breakthroughs coming to naught.

On a side note, some years ago I sent detail images from about forty pre-1830 maps to a knowledgeable regional historian, Harold Tyson, of Beardstown. I had also sent a set of the forty maps to Politsch in Quincy. I shared my ideas of Fort Crèvecoeur with Tyson, and discussed with him also the Ellington Stone, Politsch's work, and the wider historical context. Tyson reported at length anecdotally on the Indian legacy of the Beardstown area and told me of his confidence in the ancient Quincy-Beardstown route that I am focusing on. My original theory to look for La Salle's fort in the Beardstown area has sparked interest in the archeological community to search for hints of its long-vanished structures there.

On a personal excursion over the major highway between Quincy and Beardstown, approximately the same overland route seen above on the map published in 1681, I was understandably excited to come upon a historical land site marker announcing the highway as the 49ers' favored overland route of the famed 1849 California Gold rush.

Top

In Summary

In attempting to outline a historical context to demystify the Ellington Stone, I've proposed a number of ideas.

  • the insignia on the Ellington Stone identifies it as a creation of the Jesuit missionaries,
  • given the antipathy between the Jesuits and de La Salle, the Jesuit insignia disqualifies the possibility of LaSalle's involvement,
  • the most likely explanation of what it is: it's the main fragment of a gravestone, the Jesuit insignia at the top of the marker is found on Jesuit gravestones,
  • published photographs of the Ellington Stone have done injustice to its probable proper vertical positioning — the cross in the top of the H should point straight up,
  • marking on the Jesuit map of Lake Superior gives, in written notation, a very good approximation of Quincy and the homelands of the Illinois Indians, 150 French leagues to the south,
  • the Ellington Stone, at face value, forces the inference of Jesuit first-hand knowledge of the Illinois Indians homeland noted on the1672 published map of Lake Superior,
  • the Thèvenot map, published in 1681, and the narrative that it accompanied, substantiate a number of observations: the Jesuits were familiar at this time with Quincy Bay, the corridor at the 40th degree of latitude ("route of return"), and the Beardstown location at the Illinois River,
  • given the royal injunctions forbidding Jesuit missionary activity in uncharted lands, the secrecy at the time is understandable,
  • the Ellington Stone date, 1671, marks as quite probable the exploration of the Illinois region and the Mississippi River two years earlier than the "first Europeans" in the persons of Jolliet and Marquette,
  • the artifact can make a solid claim as the earliest European artifact in the North American Heartland.

Top

Home